Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 17:32:10
From: "SangJoon Lee"
Subject: Problem 6.16
I am following example 6.6 in textbook page266 to solve part a of this problem, and came up to Lagrangian function but cannot see why this method will fail. I didn't dare to solve the Lagrangian function yet since it seems to be too complicated to even go over a few step of Newton's method, and I don't even know what guess of x0 should I use. Should I still go for solving this brutal set of Lagrangian function to get a clear picture or am I in the complete wrong track and try a different approach? And for part b, when we divde our equation by rho and obtain our solution, how can we verify our solution from the Hessian matrix? -SJ
|
HTML 4.01 Updated: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 17:32:10 | Powered by Perl Net::NNTP |